SENSOMEX - THE CASE
1. SENSOMEX is a partnership company founded 25 years ago by 3 engineers fresh from the campus. It is a B2B company and its current revenue is $ 119 Mn. The company currently has 3 divisions which make and market various types of sensors for different uses. These sensors are broadly classified as sensors that sense pressure, humidity and direction and speed for navigational use. The business is still managed by the original 3 partners at the apex level : each division is headed by a partner.
a. Kenny handles Pressure sensors division : turnover of $ 40 Mn
b. Ted handles Humidity sensors division : turnover of $ 43 Mn
c. Joey handles Navigational sensors division : turnover of $ 36 Mn
2. Each partner handles front-end functions - sales force, production planning, sales & expense accounting of their divisions. Other functions are common - the treasury function is handled by Ted, Manufacturing and supply chain by Kenny and Administration and HR by Joey.
3. From an external perspective the company is financially well placed : sizeable amount of profit has been kept aside as reserves looking pretty on its balance sheet. Ted who handles the finance function of the company says that banks have repeatedly approached the company and shown their willingness to lend money to the company for expansion of facilities, extension to new markets, product up-gradation or even acquisitions of new companies.
4. However, internally, the things are not as good. The partners are worried about the inability of the company to grow well. Of particular concern are the new initiatives that were taken in the area of Humidity Sensor division 7 years ago which sucked cash but did not deliver – when a Swedish company MELOTT offered its technology to Sensomex for the Humidity Sensors and its sales force was enthused about the sales boost that could come from offering a far better technology to the market because the customers had enthusiastically endorsed the sensors using new technology. Sensomex then spent over $ 40 Mn on (a) paying Melott (b) expanding R&D facilities (c) testing of new products with customers (d) upgrading production equipment (e) expanding the sales force.
5. But in reality, the sales have been far below what the sales force had forecasted and the division was in the red for years till it broke even only last year. Ted says “ I am unable to explain why, in spite of having a better product, my division is unable to sell anywhere close to what we expected. We asked the customers too and they say they not only like the product but are also willingly paying a higher price”. He went on to add; “but as a result of this fiasco, we have not invested in the other two divisions also and the sales of the whole company are now levelling off.”
6. Of late, the partners are having differences of opinion on the future direction to take. Kenny feels that since the company failed in making the existing business grow, the only safe option is taking over one of the competing companies but he cannot clearly say which company. Ted feels the company must start a new business of office automation and telecommunications which has a great future because existing business cannot grow. Joey says taking over a new company or going into an unknown field are riskier moves – because we will have to pay a high price to take over an existing successful company - and going into an unfamiliar business will have its own trials and errors – hence it is better to invest and focus on the existing businesses. The Melott experience is obviously haunting all the three partners.
Question : Could Sensomex Have Avoided This?
Sensomex - The Teaching Note
In this case the problem is that the company does not know that they pretty much own the humidity sensors market and hence the answers to the growth of the humidity division are actually outside the existing category ! The company has been so inward looking that they had not conceived of this possibility .

External perspective
· See the huge difference - just knowing the market size – makes !
Market orientation
· Why did they not discover this for so many years?
Because they had no marketing department ?
Because the task of marketing was not assigned to someone in the company ?
Because the company / top management / sales department was not market oriented ?
Because they had no marketing department ?
Because the task of marketing was not assigned to someone in the company ?
Because the company / top management / sales department was not market oriented ?
Choosing the customer and choosing the purpose before market scanning
· They asked existing customers and all of them said they would upgrade and pay a higher price – which they did- but the fact is that the problem was never with the value proposition to the existing customers anyway - they were buying a lower quality product at lower price and now the same are buying higher quality product at a higher price
· The problem is that there are not enough customers in the market to start with – and we have no idea why they do not use humidity sensors. Actually the company should have researched the non-customers
Positioning - Value For Money
· If adding cost (better product) leads you to charge a higher price, it means that the existing customers sitting at the wrong VFM point on the quality-price curve. Is there a market for a price even higher than the raised price ?
· Is it likely that there is a market at the price point which we have just vacated and we may actually be creating a gap for a competitor to enter ? Should we therefore market two ranges of sensors – one for price-oriented customers and the other for value-oriented customers?
· Is there a market for humidity sensors at lower prices ?
· How are the customers populated around the VFM curve ?
Growth Strategy
Ansoff Matrix
Population distribution on readiness scale ( PDRS)
Population distribution on readiness scale ( PDRS)
· Existing Customers , Existing Products ( PDRS) : Penetration
· Existing Customers, New Products ( Swedish Technology ) ( PRDS ) : product dev
· New Customers, existing Products ( PRDS ) : market dev
· New Customers, new products ( PRDS ) : diversification
Basic marketing logic
· How committed to developing and providing VP for chosen customer : attractive market
o Size of the market : # of customers
o Growth of this size of the market
o Extent of competitiveness ( inversely proportional )
· How committed to accepting VP from the chosen marketer : differentiation
o Fit with the need
o How different and better than competition
o Right VFM position
· GO-To-Market effort
o How wide and how deep
o How does the sales funnel operate
o How partnerships work
What happened actually ?
· Actions taken
o No need for diversification because the pressure sensor market can provide ample growth. The company stopped looking into acquisitions unrelated to products outside its areas of expertise.
o They formed a management committee of the 3 partners to oversee all product lines rather than segmenting the firm into three discrete divisions.
o The company increased sales manpower in pressure sensor market and improved sales management inputs to ensure that the productivity per person does not fall.
o Allocated more funds for pressure sensor development
· The Result
o For 3 years grew at 11% pa
6 % higher than over the previous three-year period.
6 % higher than over the previous three-year period.
o Sales from the pressure instrument division
now account for 51 % company sales and projected to be 75 % in 7 years
now account for 51 % company sales and projected to be 75 % in 7 years
· Management harmony has increased because the decisions are based on market figures and not personalities.
Opportunities to Teach
- External perspective and important marketing terminology
- Market size : Volume and Value
- Industry and Market
- Classification of customers : Non, lapsed, current, competitors’ etc
- Right questions to right customers
- Words : Potential, Current, Loyal
- Concept of multiple markets including intermediaries and influencers
- DMU or Buying Center
- Marketing is an orientation and not a department. You can do without a marketing department but you cannot do without performing the basis marketing tasks.
- Marketing tasks
- Core processes in marketing
- Concept of Market Space : How are customers spread out
- On VFM curve
- Geographically
- Seasonally
- Application wise
- Marketing Mix wise : Type of product / price / channel wise
- Value for money concept : Customers exist at all levels in VFM curve : marketing opportunities : range development
- Adding the right costs gets you a better price
- Ansoff Matrix
- Population distribution on Readiness To Buy Scale
- Basic marketing logic : there should be a market ready to buy the products, there should be a value proposition which is attractive to both sides, there should be a go-to-market strategy for customer acquisitions
- Market size and readiness
- How committed to developing and providing VP for chosen customer : attractive market : Size of the market : # of customers. Growth of this size of the market. Extent of competitiveness ( inversely proportional )
- How committed to accepting VP from the chosen marketer : differentiation. Fit with the need. How different and better than competition. Right VFM position
- GO-To-Market effort. How wide and how deep. How does the sales funnel operate. How partnerships work